http://lnblog.skepticats.com/entries/2007/04/10_2149/comments/comments.xml LnBlog 0.9.0 is finalized LnBlog 1.0.0 http://lnblog.skepticats.com/entries/2007/04/10_2149/comments/#comment2007-04-12_014519 <p>Hello, Peter</p><p>While grabbing the archive, I found the direct link to be disfunctional - you put in &quot;www&quot; instead of &quot;lnblog&quot;.</p><p>I hope I find some time in the near future to implement and test - but I'll have to read the upgrade instructions first.</p><p>M.</p><p>P.S. My work's always cued but doesn't proceed due to lack of time - but I'm still on it!</p> http://lnblog.skepticats.com/entries/2007/04/10_2149/comments/#comment2007-04-12_014519 http://lnblog.skepticats.com/entries/2007/04/10_2149/comments/#comment2007-04-12_181908 <p>Thanks for pointing that out. The link is fixed now.</p><p> Believe it or not, that bad link was actually actually due to a bug in the subdomain handling. I actually typed in a root-relative URL and LnBlog is supposed to convert that to a fully qualified URL, with protocol and domain. However, I apparently never adjusted that code to be subdomain-aware, so it was still prepending the main URL. Oops. I guess that's one for 0.9.1. On the up side, the links are trivially fixable by just typing in the full URL. ;)</p> http://lnblog.skepticats.com/entries/2007/04/10_2149/comments/#comment2007-04-12_181908